California officers have joined a authorized effort to revive water to the Kern River after an abrupt shutoff of water dried up the river and killed hundreds of fish in Bakersfield.
The choice by state officers and Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta to intervene within the court docket case offers new impetus to environmental teams as they attempt to compel the town of Bakersfield and agricultural water districts to deliver again a flowing river.
Bonta introduced Monday that he and the California Division of Fish and Wildlife filed a quick supporting the environmental teams within the case earlier than the state’s fifth District Court docket of Attraction.
“California’s waterways and ecosystems are the lifeblood of our state’s rich and diverse wildlife and natural habitats,” Bonta mentioned. “Yet, in Bakersfield, the sudden loss of Kern River flows due to the city officials’ decisions to divert all water away from the river, is leaving behind a dry wasteland where fish are dying in droves.”
The river out of the blue dried up alongside a number of miles of its channel in Bakersfield beginning in late August. Those that first seen the abrupt lack of water included Rae McNeish, an affiliate professor at Cal State Bakersfield who was conducting organic surveys together with her college students.
They gathered information on the devastation because the flowing river dwindled to a dry riverbed, leaving lots of lifeless fish scattered on the sand and dust. By mid-September, they’d counted greater than 3,000 lifeless fish.
The collapse of the river got here as a shock in Bakersfield, the place residents had grown accustomed to seeing water flowing previous parks and beneath bridges after two moist winters. It adopted an appeals court docket ruling that cleared the best way for metropolis officers and water managers to scale back flows upstream, preserving some water behind a dam and sending different provides to farms.
A lifeless fish lies on the dry backside of the Kern River in Bakersfield in September.
(Gary Kazanjian / For The Occasions)
Bonta mentioned with the submitting of the friend-of-the-court transient, “we urge the Court to allow enough water to flow in the Kern River, as required by law, to preserve ecosystems and ensure sustainability and viability of our fish populations.”
Within the state’s transient, Bonta targeted on the significance of a sure state environmental statute: Fish and Sport Code Part 5937. It requires that every one dam house owners and operators launch enough water to maintain fish under the dams in “good condition.”
Six environmental teams have additionally cited this statute of their case. The teams, led by Convey Again the Kern and Water Audit California, sued Bakersfield in 2022, arguing that permitting water diversions to dry up the river violates California’s public belief doctrine, the precept that sure pure sources should be preserved for the general public.
The town controls a number of weirs the place water is diverted. A number of the water is utilized in Bakersfield, however a lot of it’s utilized by agricultural water districts to produce farms that produce almonds, pistachios, grapes, oranges and different crops.
Final 12 months, a decide granted the environmental teams a preliminary injunction requiring the town to make sure enough water to maintain the river flowing and supply for fish. However agricultural water districts appealed that ruling. And earlier this 12 months, an appeals court docket froze the decide’s order, successfully permitting for the river to be drained and dried up whereas the case is pending in Kern County Superior Court docket.
The lawyer common’s workplace mentioned in its announcement that in late August, the town of Bakersfield “once again diverted all of the flows from the Kern River below the Calloway Weir to deliver to agricultural customers, leaving thousands of fish to die.”
The lawyer common’s transient argues that metropolis officers should comply with the regulation and launch enough water to maintain the river flowing and fish in “good condition.”
The dewatering of the river and the mass fish die-off sparked an outpouring of concern locally. Metropolis officers have mentioned they wish to make extra water out there for the Kern River however that the current court docket resolution doesn’t at the moment enable for that.
A spokesperson for the town declined to remark concerning the lawyer common’s resolution to intervene within the case.
The environmental teams’ lawsuit is directed on the metropolis but additionally lists agricultural irrigation districts that obtain water as events, together with the Kern Delta Water Storage District, North Kern Water Storage District and Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District.
Officers with the California Division of Fish and Wildlife mentioned final month that they have been investigating whether or not the drying of the river constituted a violation of state regulation.
Because the company signed on to intervene within the court docket case, Division of Fish and Wildlife Director Charlton “Chuck” Bonham mentioned failing to supply sufficient water for fish “not only damages ecosystems and fish populations but also violates California law.”
Bonham mentioned the division is standing with the lawyer common “to help protect these irreplaceable fish populations for generations to come.”
State officers have beforehand taken the identical place, together with a case years in the past involving the Napa River, mentioned William McKinnon, a lawyer for the group Water Audit California.
“I hope that we get a good, unequivocal statement from the appellate court that puts to rest all of these arguments forever, because they’re getting old,” McKinnon mentioned.
He mentioned he additionally hopes the state’s involvement within the case results in cooperative discussions “to reconcile human and environmental needs.”
“We just want the environmental flows to be there,” McKinnon mentioned. “We still have no water. We still have dead fish.”
