October 3, 2024
3 min learn
How ‘River Piracy’ Helped Give Mount Everest a Progress Spurt
A mannequin suggests an enormous uplift brought on by a phenomenon known as “river piracy” partly explains Everest’s spectacular peak
Mount Everest is unusually excessive, even when put next with different mountains within the Himalayas.
Daniel Prudek/Alamy Inventory Photograph
How did Mount Everest come to be the world’s tallest mountain, towering greater than 200 metres above the subsequent two highest peaks? Geologists recommend the mountain owes a part of its additional peak to 2 historical rivers that flowed via the Himalayas and merged about 89,000 years in the past. The ensuing erosion eliminated a lot rock and soil that Everest has rebounded upwards by as a lot as 50 metres, they are saying.
The outer crust of Earth responds to the removing of mass by slowly rising, says co-author Matt Fox, a geologist at College School London. “This has increased the elevation of Everest.”
Everest, also referred to as Chomolungma and Sagarmāthā, stands 8,849 metres above sea degree, within the Himalayan mountain chain, which additionally accommodates the world’s third-highest peak, Kanchenjunga (8,586 metres) and isn’t removed from the second-highest, K2 (8,611 metres). The Himalayas have been pushed up by the continued collision of India with the remainder of Asia.
On supporting science journalism
For those who’re having fun with this text, contemplate supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales concerning the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at this time.
Fox and his colleagues argue, in a examine printed in Nature Geoscience at this time, that a part of the reason for Everest’s excessive peak lies within the close by Arun River.
Historical stream
The Arun rises north of the Himalayas however its course rapidly turns south, reducing a gorge via the mountains earlier than becoming a member of the massive Kosi River. “For 100 years, people have wondered why this river cuts through the tallest mountain ranges,” says Fox.
One chance is that the Arun was like that earlier than the Himalayas fashioned. Nevertheless, many geologists suspect the Himalayas have been there first. They suppose that the Arun as soon as had a distinct course, and that it eroded its approach via the mountains till it merged with a northerly river. This type of occasion is named river seize or river piracy, says Fox.
“It could have been quite a dramatic event,” says Fox. “It might have happened during a time of flooding.”
Fox, working with colleagues together with Jin-Gen Dai, a geologist on the China College of Geosciences in Beijing, discovered that the Arun is a dramatic gorge with near-vertical sides in comparison with neighbouring rivers, suggesting it’s comparatively younger. They used fashions to simulate the potential seize occasion, and located that it might have elevated erosion alongside the river’s path, explaining the bizarre channel.
The arguments for seize are fairly sturdy, says geologist Peter van der Beek on the College of Potsdam in Germany. “They clearly show it’s different from the other rivers,” he says, “and you wouldn’t see that if it was a pre-existing river.” Earlier research have pointed to situations of river piracy elsewhere within the Himalayas, and to erosion alongside the Arun affecting close by mountains.
The staff’s best-fit mannequin means that the Arun seize occasion occurred 89,000 years in the past. Since then, the Arun has quickly eroded its channel, carrying away huge quantities of sediment. Launched from this mass, the crust may bob slowly upwards. The staff estimates that this ‘isostatic rebound’ has added between 15 and 50 metres to Everest’s elevation. Related mechanisms have been described earlier than, together with within the Himalayas.
Too simplistic?
Van der Beek is much less satisfied by these arguments. He says the timing of the river seize is unsure, as a result of the staff used a easy mannequin of river behaviour.
And the estimates of the mountain rising by 15–50 metres depend upon the long-term charges of tectonic uplift and erosion, which aren’t effectively understood, he provides. That’s partly as a result of measurements of those charges return for just a few many years: not lengthy sufficient to incorporate dramatic seismic occasions. Van der Beek factors out that in 2015, a magnitude-7.8 earthquake in Nepal triggered many Himalayan mountains to subside by round 1 metre. Over lengthy timescales, a number of large quakes can considerably have an effect on mountain peak.
This text is reproduced with permission and was first printed on October 1, 2024.
